I am re-posting this article
Please read it again before you continue below
When I published it last term Helen commented:
" I find interesting how theories of connectivism manifest through movement in the practice of improvisation. Improvisation relies of a trust in individuals, in self and others, with a shared understanding of the co-creation of the space, the dance, through the networks that underpin the practice and the patterns that emerge as we interact. As we offer and respond through improvised movement encounters we share, I feel, elements both of Downes and Siemens theories here. Look forward to talking more on this ..."
As you think about Connectivism as a way of engaging with the course, also think about what it says about larger connections with the world, with your practice. Helen has thought about this in terms of her practice of improvisation.
Often people describe improvisation as 'just doing something' with no framework. For me, through Connectivisum I can consider nothing is without an emergence of a framework (even if it is momentary and then changes). Sometimes engagement is through witnessing the framework, letting it emerge and not starting by confirming it before you agree to start. This could the difference between improvisation and codified techniques.
For me Connectivism and this course are about how you move within to understand the framework, how you witness the space. For me the arts are about how we witness the space. It is not about confirming a framework and then shoehorning everything into what you think it is. This is because a framework is only as useful as your understanding of it and as your understanding grows the framework changes.
Please comment below... what do you feel...?